TIER.01
方案设计
$2,500 起
固定费用 · 1–2 周
ADU、加建、简单住宅、自建业主的申报前澄清。
- 方案平面图
- 外立面 (4)
- 基本总平面图
- 规范策略备忘
- 1 轮修改
- 本地叠加规范风险清单
报价
协作 · 卓越 · 设计
多数项目为固定费用。仅当范围确实无法事先界定时按小时计费。无定金游戏,无范围蔓延。
免费咨询 · 无需预付 · 当日回复
合作层级
大部分项目可清晰落入三条线之一。我们按匹配的线报价,而不是按平方英尺单价表。
TIER.01
$2,500 起
固定费用 · 1–2 周
ADU、加建、简单住宅、自建业主的申报前澄清。
推荐
TIER.02
$8,500 起
固定费用 · 3–5 周
自定义住宅、整栋住宅、小型商业租赁改造。
TIER.03
$22,500 起
固定费用 · 仅范围未定时按小时 · 6–12 周
多户住宅、中高层商业、复杂规范分析、分阶段工作。
附加项
报价时按范围计价。多数在基础层上加5–20%。我们在您承诺前告知具体数字。
写实外立面与关键室内画面。包含两轮修改。
压缩日程,含周末工时。视工作室排期而定。
紧凑施工日程下的非工作时段电话与门户响应。
全双语图框、图页注释与工程图。
清晰的变更单包,含签字与竣工差异。
施工期 RFI 批处理,工作日当日响应。
不包含
我们不盖结构、MEP 或土木章 — 这些需要执照工程师,我们把这部分工作留给工程师。我们为您协调分包并按成本传递费用,无加价。测量、土壤报告与专项顾问同理。每张发票您都看得到。我们乐意推荐山谷里我们最信任的工程师。
Proven Sets · 简单项目档
适用于能套用我们已在 Phoenix、Mesa 或 Scottsdale 通过审图的基础图纸的简单标准项目——更小的产品,对应更低的固定价。若您的项目需要设计、速度或复杂形体,上方的服务档位才是正确选择。
PS.01
$2,450 固定价
非结构性 · 现有楼板
PS.02
$3,650 固定价
单层 · 600 平方英尺以内
PS.03
$3,950 固定价
独立式 · 地面楼板 · 单层
项目预检 — $295
入口环节:我们审核您的测绘、现状图与资格条件,出具书面结论。费用 100% 抵扣图纸套装。
审图回复保障 — $495
可选:我们以固定价回复首封审图意见函。若审图指出我们图纸中的错误,我们永远免费修正。
追加修改每轮 $495
已含一轮合并修改;追加轮次均为固定价——绝无按小时计费。
Phoenix · Mesa · Scottsdale。付款方式:50% 预定排期,50% 于交付终稿前支付。下单即给出承诺交付日期(通常 3–4 周;无加急通道)。图纸不含盖章——如需结构签章,由您的工程师完成(可为您引荐我们的结构合作伙伴,由您直接委托)。任何布局改动、复杂形体或名单之外的辖区,转入上方服务档位;交付前若项目升级,已付费用 100% 抵扣完整服务。
What your fee actually buys
A permit-ready set, an inspector's clean pass, and a building under construction.
FAQ
约 80% 的合作为固定费用 — 方案、可申报与多数完整文档项目都按一个数字带里程碑报价。仅当范围确实无法事先界定时(如探索性可行性或开放式规范研究)采用按小时——费率在开始前书面确认。
方案包含 1 轮修改。可申报包含 2 轮。完整文档通常包含 3 轮加上所有审图修改循环。超过部分按每轮固定价,凭书面变更单计费 — 绝无意外发票。
需要 — 通常 25% 启动,方案里程碑 50%,申报提交时付清余款。我们用 Stripe 与 ACH 在客户门户中收款。除非您特别想用,否则不收支票。
是的 — 我们在全国范围出可申报图集。总部位于凤凰城;我们在全美每一州都工作,在亚利桑那、加利福尼亚、内华达、新墨西哥、德克萨斯与俄亥俄州尤为熟悉。我们不接对当地审图机构无法可信沟通的项目 — 那是延误申报的根源,遇到时我们会告知。
项目沟通、录入、合同与客户门户提供英语、西班牙语与中文,无额外费用 — 这就是我们工作室的运作方式。完整翻译的文档集(图页注释、规格、工程图)是附加项,因为会增加制图工时。
常见疑虑
Most permit sets start around $3,500. The fee is fixed and quoted to your specific scope — a smaller project like an ADU or a tenant improvement sits near the starting figure, while a full custom home or a multifamily building is higher. About 80% of our work is a single fixed price agreed before you sign; we only fall back to an hourly arrangement — quoted in writing before we start — when the scope is genuinely undefined (early feasibility or code research). Stamps, city permit fees, and specialty consultants are itemized separately so the all-in number is never a surprise.
Some are excellent. The risk isn't the drawing quality — it's the back-end. When the AHJ requests a correction at 4pm on a Wednesday, the offshore drafter is asleep and your construction calendar is held up two weeks. When your GC asks "what's the framing detail at the gable end," they need an answer in the next hour, not the next morning. Our fixed fee bundles the corrections, the GC follow-ups, the AHJ resubmittal, the schedule slippage you don't have to absorb. If your project is small and the schedule is loose, offshore is genuinely cost-effective. For anything on a contract calendar, it isn't.
If they have one in-house, that's often the right answer — they're embedded in the project and know the trades. The cases where firms hire us instead of using a GC's drafter: (1) the GC is bidding the project and needs an unbiased drawing set, (2) the GC's drafter is overloaded, (3) the AHJ has rejected the GC's sets before and the project needs a clean third-party submittal. None of those are "the GC's drafter is bad" — they're scheduling and bias issues.
Nothing extra — two rounds of revisions before CD freeze are bundled into the fixed fee, and AHJ corrections after submittal are bundled too. The only revision that's billed extra is substantive scope change after CD freeze (you decide to add a second floor, change the cuisine for a restaurant TI, etc.). Those are quoted transparently before the work starts.
For projects where the scope is well-defined (TI, ADU, custom home from a clear program brief, multifamily from a sketch), fixed fee is usually 30–40% less expensive than hourly because there's no incentive for the drafter to take longer. For projects that genuinely need exploration (a renovation where the as-builts are wrong, a heritage building where we're negotiating with planning every week), hourly is more honest. We default to fixed fee and switch to hourly only when the scope demands it — and we tell you upfront.
Plan-check corrections are bundled — we respond at no extra fee. If the AHJ rejects the package for a substantive reason that was in our scope to catch (we missed a code requirement, mis-specified a detail), we revise at no extra fee until it passes. The only AHJ rejections we don't cover for free are those triggered by client decisions made after CD freeze (you changed something) or by AHJ scope expansion (the reviewer asks for a new structural calc that wasn't required at submittal). Those get quoted transparently.
Yes — typical schedule is 30% on contract sign, 40% at construction-docs milestone, 30% at permit issuance. For larger multifamily / commercial projects we sometimes structure four payments around schematic / DD / CD / issuance. Card, ACH, or check; we don't accept crypto.
Stamps (architect or engineer, when required), specialty consultant fees (geotech, civil, landscape, low-voltage), permit fees themselves (paid to the AHJ, not us), as-built measurement (itemized), and 3D renderings beyond what we produce for the architectural set (we partner with a renderer when needed). Every itemized cost is named on the quote — no surprises at invoice time.